What's gonna be more unreliable?*

"If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent" (essextee) 06/16/2015 at 18:05 • Filed to: None

0

8

An E39 with 245k miles, or an S-type with 90k? I may have an opportunity to make an even trade for the Jaaaaag. I haven’t looked at it yet but I want your Oppoinions(tm).

*read: more of a money pit

Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 06/16/2015 at 18:06

1

The S-Type, by far

My citroen won't start > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 06/16/2015 at 18:15

0

I was thinking about this recently, isn’t the Stype made up of many different Ford parts?

djmt1 > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 06/16/2015 at 18:21

1

Jag more likely to go wrong but it’s parts are a lot cheaper.

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > My citroen won't start 06/16/2015 at 18:22

0

Yes, but not as much as the X type was. The big question is the electricals.

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > djmt1 06/16/2015 at 18:27

0

The bmw has had a clutch, flywheel, radiator, and water pump done all within the last 10k so it could be quite a while before something else needs fixing.

BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 06/16/2015 at 18:57

2

I thought about this so hard I started to get a headache.

Flip a coin. You're likely to get hosed either way. I'd probably take the Jag.

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind 06/16/2015 at 19:18

0

BMW is not a diesel.

boxrocket > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 06/17/2015 at 01:03

0

The S-Type is a safer bet, and the car for a connoisseur rather than the bro/brah.